<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia is Freaking Me Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voodoologic.org/2008/02/21/wikipedia-is-freaking-me-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voodoologic.org/2008/02/21/wikipedia-is-freaking-me-out/</link>
	<description>Apply topically to relieve boredom</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stark Raving Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.voodoologic.org/2008/02/21/wikipedia-is-freaking-me-out/comment-page-1/#comment-10311</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark Raving Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voodoologic.org/2008/02/21/wikipedia-is-freaking-me-out/#comment-10311</guid>
		<description>Since first reading this I have been rechecking my Wiki facts. Trouble is the next search I come accross always seem to be answers.com, which by some strange coincidence often seems to be word for word what wikipedia has.  Hmm so two places with the exact same information must be correct then.

Looking up Wikipedia on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia) gives us some hint as to the vetting process, but what you end up with is just information by censensus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since first reading this I have been rechecking my Wiki facts. Trouble is the next search I come accross always seem to be answers.com, which by some strange coincidence often seems to be word for word what wikipedia has.  Hmm so two places with the exact same information must be correct then.</p>
<p>Looking up Wikipedia on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia) gives us some hint as to the vetting process, but what you end up with is just information by censensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
